In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?
a. readers of john milton's paradise lost often search for a hero in the form of a character, which is fruitless.
b. iku saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of epics, but its a common flaw to call the first the greatest?
c. alex fernandez's interpretation of j. d. salinger's the catcher in the rye is interesting but ultimately flawed.
d. henry taylor's argument seems to be developeing but his essay is an unfinished thesis, not a published article.

Question: In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?

Options:

The correct answer is option B) Iku Saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of Epics, but it's a common flaw to call the first the greatest.

Explanation: The credibility of a source can be questioned or challenged based on the lack of evidence given. In the example given above, the person is questioning or challenging the credibility of Homer actually being the greatest writer if epics. He mentions that even though he was the first writer in epics, that doesn't make him the best.

that there are poor conditions

the objective should be switched