In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of synthesizing claims into a single conclusion?
a. even though we all have our own opinions why, we're agreed that aphra behn was one of the first feminist authors.
b. when you argue that shakespeare was anti-imperialist, you don't really use any kind of evidence that would hold up under close scrutiny.
c. i don't quite understand what standards you're using when you say that homer was the greatest epic writer.
d. people have interpreted j. d. salinger's the catcher in the rye in many different ways, some optimistically and some pessimistically.

The correct answer is option A. "Even though we all have our own opinions why, we're agreed that Aphra Behn was one of the first feminist authors.". Group discussion are useful to gather information and collect different opinions that would complete a discussion about a topic. However, group discussion should be properly managed in order to have a conclusion despite of the different point of view of each individual. Agreeing that Aphra Behn was one of the first feminist authors even though each individual have her or his own opinion on why, is a proper way of coming to a single conclusion.

a simile is first defined as a type of speech that uses one thing or phrase with comparisons to things of an unrelated kind, often in order to make a more vivacious description. so of the phrases above, only the last one (i swear she cast a shadow white as stone) would be considered a simile, as a shadow white as stone takes two unrelated things and uses them in an interesting way.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!