What idea is discussed in both tim o'brien's "ambush" and john steinbeck's "symptoms"?

Both Steinbeck’s “Symptoms” and O'Brien's "Ambush" talk about the eventual outcomes of war on officers. Be that as it may, the creators have diverse perspectives. O'Brien's tone toward fighters and casualties of war is thoughtful. The eventual outcomes of war incorporate blame, flashbacks, and rejection. Then again, Steinbeck talks about war and its impact on fighters in a relatively logical way. He trusts that a soldier ends up hesitant and dislikes recollecting the occasions of war in light of the fact that the situations are horrendous.

Regardless of talking about comparative subjects of war in the story "Ambush" and exposition "Symptoms," O'Brien and Steinbeck picked distinctive genres and modes to show their perspectives. In any case, when we think about the arrangement of the two writings, both write-ups have a similar subject of war, yet they pass on separate messages. While O'Brien's story demonstrates that fighters always remember their activities and encounters at war and can frequently be loaded with a lifetime of blame and lament, Steinbeck guarantees that troopers shut out wartime encounters since they are horrible.

Moreover, "the debilitating effect of soldiers’ physical maladies" encompasses both texts.

hello there!

if i was with a celebrity, i would be with andrew lincoln from the walking dead. this is because i love his work he has done in the show and he is a great actor!

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)