Why does analyzing character motivation matter? give an example using something that you’ve seen or read recently. in the short story: "the bet" by anton p. chekhov

Character motivation shows the reaction of the characters in certain conflicts and in situation against them. While reading the story, the reader calculates the possible resolutions. In the short story of "Bet", the banker asks questions from himself, namely he self-judges himself. His thoughts on the issue make the reader learn more about him and certainly understand his motives. When he thinks that "On my part, it was the caprice of a well-fed man", it reveals his motivation for the bet. It was aimed for the purpose of entertainment.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

it should be repealed cuase its not fair