1 Which statement supports the claim in the first essay that the benefits of hydraulic fracturing
outweigh the risks?
A "To access shale gas, gas companies drill wells several thousand feet into the earth."
B
"Using shale gas also benefits homeowners because it reduces their heating and
electricity bills."
C "Hydraulic fracturing, also called 'fracking.' is harmful to people and the environment
because it pollutes drinking water."
D "These chemicals seep into the ground surrounding the well and contaminate
groundwater."

butt

explanation:

go to this website .

but i think it is 2

in a way yes you create your own scheduele but you kind of dont too

explanation:

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.