PLEASE HELP FOR 44 POINTS- Give an in depth description of M. Loisel's point of view throughout the events on Guy De Maupassant's The Necklace. Be sure to include textual support to describe his reaction to the dress, Mathilde's behavior at the ball Mathilde losing the necklace, the loans, and the surprise ending.

THE STORY IS CALLED THE NECKLACE BY GUY DE MAUPASSANT'S

Explanation:

The horrible irony of the fact that the Loisels spent years paying off a replacement for what was actually a worthless necklace is just one instance of irony evident in “The Necklace.” Also ironic is the fact that Mathilde’s beauty, which had been her only valued asset, disappears as a result of her labor for the necklace. She had borrowed the necklace to be seen as more beautiful and winds up losing her looks completely. Perhaps the most bitter irony of “The Necklace” is that the arduous life that Mathilde must assume after losing the necklace makes her old life—the one she resented so fully—seem luxurious. She borrows Madame Forestier’s necklace to give the appearance of having more money than she really does, only to then lose what she does have. She pays doubly, with her money and looks, for something that had no value to begin with.

idk

explanation: