In paragraph 9, in the “Counterpoint” essay, the author argues that the flag is a symbol of freedom and that burning the flag causes emotional distress to many Americans, especially members of the armed forces and their families. Does the author provide relevant evidence for this argument? How does rhetoric affect the argument? Use evidence in the text that you would consider relevant. Explain why this evidence does or does not convince you that flag burning as protest should be banned

option plz

Explanation:

may i ask what topic?

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)