GUYS! I REALLY NEED HELP REAL QUICK! By using a first-person narrator, Walter Dean Myers ensures that readers will experience Sunrise Over Fallujah only through what Robin is able to see, hear, think, and observe. How might the story’s point of view be different if a different character, Jonesy for example, was the first-person narrator who told the story? How might the tone of the story be different? Using details from the text, write an essay explaining how the excerpt would be different if told from Jonesy’s point of view. What might Jonesy notice that would be different from what Robin observes? What would Jonesy’s attitude be toward life in the camp? Would he share Robin’s excitement or have other feelings? What would Jonesy have to say about Robin himself? Would his point of view on Robin be favorable? Use what you have learned about tone to establish a formal tone in your essay, and maintain it. Use textual evidence to support your ideas.

ich statement best shows a problem in travels with charley?

one sharp difficulty presented itself. in the intervening twenty-five years my name had become reasonably well known.

this being so, my trip demanded that i leave my name and my identity at home.

i had to go alone and i had to be self-contained, a kind of casual turtle carrying his house on his back.

with all this in mind i wrote to the head office of a great corporation which manufactures trucks.

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).

- "d.)  describe the iroquois belief of how the earth was created. for the iroquois, there was no reason to explain the importance of rituals. also, as animists, they didn't need a special elaboration as to why animals are important or why they had a crucial role in the earth's creation. this is just an authentic myth that explains the creation of the earth. every culture has produced creation myths."