Read the following paragraph. (1) Chewing animals would not eat the chili's hot fruit. (2)
Good thing, too, because chewing was gonna hurt the
seeds. (3) Birds ate the peppers, however. (4) The seeds
passed through the birds and landed on the ground to
sprout new plants.
How should sentence 2 be changed so it has the right tone?
A. This was good because chewing would have hurt the seeds.

sufficient and relevant

explanation:

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )

where is the graph?

i only can answer with a graph!