In the passage, which detail best supports the central idea? Food Safety
Many people often ask "How do I know if foods in the freezer are safe?" Every year, thousands of callers to the U. S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Meat and Poultry Hotline aren't sure about the safety of items stored in their own home freezers. The confusion seems to
be based on the fact that few people understand how freezing protects food. That's why it is important to educate oneself on how to freeze
food safely. The more knowledge people have about their foods, the more they can protect themselves from illnesses caused by spoiled food.
One thing to remember is that food stored constantly at 0 degrees Fahrenheit will always be safe. Only the quality suffers with lengthy
freezer storage. Freezing keeps food safe by slowing the movement of molecules, causing microbes to enter a dormant stage. Freezing
preserves food for extended periods. It prevents the growth of microorganisms that cause both food spoilage and foodborne illness.
A way to preserve the quality of food is to pay attention to the packaging. Proper packaging helps maintain quality and prevent freezer
burn. It is safe to freeze meat or poultry directly in its original packaging: however, this type of wrap is permeable to air. This may cause
quality to finish over time. For prolonged storage, overwrap these packages as you would any food for long-term storage. It is not necessary
to rinse meat and poultry. Freeze unopened vacuum packages as is. If you notice that a package has accidentally been torn or has opened
while food is in the freezer, the food is still safe to use; merely overwrap or rewrap it.
Because freezing keeps food safe almost indefinitely, recommended storage times are for quality only. To determine the quality, first check
for odor. Some foods will develop a rancid or off odor when frozen too long and should be discarded. Some may not look picture perfect or
be of high enough quality to serve alone but may be edible; use them to make soups or stews.

Martin luther king jr often spoke of a day in the future when he hoped that his children would be judged not by their skin color but instead by their character. write a narrative essay about a moment in your life when you were judged by something other than the content of your character. use narrative techniques to develop experiencies, events, and characters

Brainliest 98 points it’s so fragile even just saying its name can break it. what is it?

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."