subject
English, 04.05.2021 20:40 iwhi8131

Read the passage and answer the question Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under charge for the suspected crime of
having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be
my work this evening to prove to you that by voting, I committed no crime. Instead, I simply
exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National
Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.

The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice,
insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare,
and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."
This was created by the people. Not just the white male citizens. And we formed it, to gain
the blessings of liberty. This was not meant to be for only some of the people, but the whole
people. This includes women as well as men. It is disrespectful to talk to women about the
liberty that they cannot have. They are denied the use of a ballot in a democratic
government.

The government cannot make the right to vote based on being male or female. This is a
violation of the supreme law of the land. Currently, freedom is being withheld from women.
This is not a democracy. It is an aristocracy where the lower class is being overlooked. We are
being considered the lowest class because we are women. The rich are controlling the poor.
Several makes of dictionaries, including Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen
to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office. Why then are women
unable to vote? Why then am I being charged with a crime because I voted?

The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of
our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are
citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall shorten
their privileges. Every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the
several states is today null and void.

31. Compare and contrast Anthony’s definition of a person to the government’s definition of a person. Include two details from the passage to support your response.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
Mr. pontellier did not attend these soirée musicales. he considered them bourgeois, and found more diversion at the club. to madame ratignolle he said the music dispensed at her soirées was too "heavy," too far beyond his untrained comprehension. his excuse flattered her. but she disapproved of mr. pontellier's club, and she was frank enough to tell edna so. which statement best describes the point of view in the excerpt? the third-person point of view is voiced by an objective character in the story. the third-person point of view is voiced by a subjective character in the story. the third-person point of view is an omniscient observer. the third-person point of view is an observer with limited omniscience.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:20
Read the excerpt from the time traveler's guide to elizabethan england.simon forman, who does attend plague sufferers, is a rare exception: this is because he has himself survived the disease and believes he cannot catch it again. however, his remedy amounts to little more than avoiding eating onions and keeping warm. he has a recipe for getting rid of the plague sores that will afflict you afterward if you survive the disease; but that is a very big "if.” it seems the best advice is provided by nicholas bownd in his book medicines for the plague: "in these dangerous times god must be our only defense.”which lines best summarize the excerpt?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 15:30
Match the writing to the author or description. 1. history of the kings of britain layamon 2. brut twelfth-century literature 3. proverbs of alfred ballad 4. the twa sisters collection of wise sayings 5. sermons, sayings, history geoffrey of monmouth
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 15:30
Read the following passage and explain how wiesel interrupts the narration of the story to emphasize the truth behind what eliezer witnesses. "not far from us, flames, huge flames, were rising from a ditch. something was being burning there. a truck drew close and unloaded its hold: small children. babies! yes, 1 did see this, with my own children thrown into the frames. (is it any wonder that ever since then, sleep tends to elude me? )"
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage and answer the question Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight u...
Questions
question
History, 14.07.2019 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.07.2019 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367