Guys , i need ur help with somethings :analyze its parts and transitions. "Those who think that RTÜK should not have the right to interfere with what we watch assert that censors of TV programs make subjective decisions and censor programs discriminately. They may be right to some extent; some decisions taken by RTÜK in past years have been harshly criticized in newspapers. However, this does not mean that they always take the wrong decisions. When RTÜK, for example, punishes a channel broadcasting programs that include violence or racism, it is right in taking such decisions as this type of interference helps control the possible chaos in the society. As such contents result in moral deterioration in the long run, the control mechanism which is applied by RTÜK through warnings and punishments are for the benefit of the society. Moreover, RTÜK’s decisions on such programs can never be considered wrong since such content is unacceptable and unethical according to the universal moral codes. Therefore, such borders of morality are strictly set and any program exceeding these borders should be warned and punished as RTÜK does. "

- Now answer the following question: Is it a good refutation? Verify your answer by explaining in details what attitude the arguer adopts and what he does here. Develop your answer by identifying and analyzing each transition and part of this refutation
2. .What type of logical fallacy does the arguer make in the following argument? Explain your answer.

" The American books should be either censored or banned. Since it is impossible to ban them, these comics should be censored."