Scenario: My sisters friend received a personal letter that expressed someone’s hate towards Asian people and that every Asian people were the reason for the pandemic. The letter was too upsetting, unrefined, and vulgar to share. If you had a chance and were given a platform to speak to these people such as the Miss Universe stage, an inauguration speech or TedTalk, what would you say? Task: Compose a speech that is at least 20 sentences long about your visions towards a better society. Think education, awareness, and compassion. Your speech must include facts, the Civil rights movement, universal declaration of human rights, and the Declaration of Independence. You can also include your personal experiences. Use Aristotle’s, ethos, pathos, logos. Capture the audiences attention and make it interesting

Essay Below

Explanation:

Written by Appleπ101 on

Violence against Asians have grown despite movements to stop. This is a clear violation of the 15th Amendment which clearly states that "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.". This includes any hate or vulgar language shown toward any race, ethnicity, gender identity, etc.

I believe that regardless of these clear laws through nonviolent protest, the civil rights movement of the 1950s and '60s broke the pattern of public facilities' being segregated by “race”. In the South and achieved the most important breakthrough. Another example is in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights where it says, "Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.". This means to me that without clear evidence that a being has done something against human nature, or against the law, we cannot accuse them of something based on the quote above.

Nowhere in the Constitution—or in the Declaration of Independence, for that matter—are human beings classified according to factors such as race, skin color, ethnicity, sex, or religion. This is clear evidence that prejudice against Asians and Asian Americans is not right.

Even Aristotle said the reason being that he truly believed that people uneducated about government would choose a bad one. The terrible side that believes that Native Americans, Asian, African-American, etc are NOT equal, or the side that sticks to the law and not biased. First the terrible killing of African Americans based on the color of their skin, which Martin Luther King Jr tried so hard to stop, which Rosa Parks stayed put on her seat for, and for Nelson Mandela got put into jail for. All so that the world would be equal. All so that the world would see Asians, Native Americans, Muslims and all religions would have the right to freedom of speech, religion, and much more. But still, people didn't see through how MLK, RBG, and many more influential people worked hard.

My first experience happened just ... I hope that we are not judged by the color of our skin, but quality of our character. Thank you for listening

Hope this helps!

P.S I am sorry your sister had to go through that!

question: which statement best describes a similarity in purpose between the frames and excerpt?

answer: both inform the reader that faryad and liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station

explanation: so as you see they were told to leave before they could tell there story

question answered by

(jacemorris)

awnser:

over the two days of the convention, presided over by lucretia’s husband james mott, the declaration of sentiments was read and its resolutions debated. the ninth resolution continued to be the most controversial, particularly because the attendees were predominantly quaker, and quaker men often declined to vote. freed slave and newspaper editor frederick douglass argued for approval of the resolution and convinced the audience of its necessity. at the end of the convention, about 100 of the attendees signed the declaration, although some removed their names later due to criticism.