subject
English, 14.05.2021 14:00 2005AngelMoore

Which of the following inferences is best supported by the following passage Paragraphs 39-42)?
"At ten o'clock the house began to die.
The wind blew. A falling tree bough crashed through the
kitchen window. Cleaning solvent, bottled, shattered over the
stove. The room was ablaze in an instant! "Firel" screamed a
voice. The house lights flashed, water pumps shot water from
the ceilings. But the solvent spread on the linoleum, licking,
eating, under the kitchen door, while the voices took it up in
chorus: "Fire, fire, fire!"
The house tried to save itself. Doors sprang tightly shut, but the
windows were broken by the heat and the wind blew and
sucked upon the fire.
The house gave ground as the fire in ten billion angry sparks
moved with flaming ease from room to room and then up the
stairs. While scurrying water rats squeaked from the walls,
pistoled their water, and ran for more. And the wall sprays let
down showers of mechanical rain."
A. The house dies because it gives up hope that the family will ever
return
B. The house would have burned even if the family had been alive.
C. The house falls apart because it has not been maintained by
humans
D. The house would have been saved if the family had been there.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:50
What does “.com" stand for? commercialcommerce commutingcommunication
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Someone answer this asap for an office manger uses the function s(x) to determine the number of shirts the company can make when the employees work for a total of x hours. when the employees have worked for a total of 300 hours, they produces 500 shirts. which equation correctly represents the company’s production of shirts? a. s(300) = 500 b. s(300) = 800 c. s(500) = 300 d. s(500) = 800
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Will give if correct read the passage first of all, if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that [it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest, but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norgay gazed down upon the world from its summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
What evidence does the author provide to demonstrate bach natural musical talent
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following inferences is best supported by the following passage Paragraphs 39-42)?
Questions
question
French, 18.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2020 05:01
question
Physics, 18.10.2020 05:01
question
History, 18.10.2020 05:01
Questions on the website: 13722362