In general, readers today have a better understanding of science than readers in 1898. How would the tone of the passage's narrator have affected readers in 1898 versus readers today? O A. It would have seemed more exciting.
O B. It would have seemed more authoritative.
O C. It would have seemed more terrifying.
O D. It would have seemed ruder. ​

the answer would be d. he tells the story through a teenage narrator.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

there is no excerpt.

put the excerpt in the comments and ill answer.

"rodney quicklt turned away and darted into a crowed of student" i thinks thats it but idk