Plz help meh!! When readers make predictions, they are

A. using what they already know,
B. changing the outcome of the story
C. ignoring dues that are provided in the text
D. ignoring supportive evidence that suggests that may happen next

A

Explanation:You Can’t Change the outcome of a already written story you aren’t ignoring dues or supportI’ve evidence because you wouldn’t make a predication if you know what was going to happen so therefore the only answer that makes sense is A

A, because predictions cannot be made if nothing about the thing they are studying is known

Explanation: also, delete that image because the popo will delete the image.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

which speech are you talking about?