Which statement is an example of a debater using an opponent's ideas in his or her own argument?
Read the excerpt from "Animal Rights
Debate."
Resolved: Justice requires the recognition of animal
rights.
Affirmative: Recognizing animal rights is simply the
morally correct thing to do. Causing pain and suffering to
any living thing is morally wrong, whether the victim is a
human or an animal. Some animals' physiological and
mental capacities are similar to those of
infants. According to Emory University primatologists,
studies of chimpanzees suggest that primates use tools,
cooperate, and even have a theory of mind. This means
that there is evidence that chimps, and perhaps other
animals, can reflect on their thoughts and behavior, just
like humans. We are no more justified in denying direct
moral status to animals than in denying moral status to
human beings.
Negative: Animals have no moral rights. They lack any
O Animals deserve moral and legal rights because
animals support and comfort humans in times of
need.
O Animals do not deserve moral and legal rights
because they are incapable of rational thought and
because they act on instinct, which makes them
dangerous.
O While ancient philosophers claimed that animals are
not capable of judgment, more recent work from
primatologists at Emory University has revealed that
chimpanzees show physiological and mental
capacities.
O Philosophers have built tre foundation of modern-day
thought on the subject of animals and their lack of any
sense of morality. Since animals are unable to behave
S and Frit
Next
Submit