The writer is considering deleting the following sentence, A century ago, life expectancy was closer to 54
Should the writer delete the sentence? Why or why not?
Yes, because this information is stated elsewhere in the passage
Yes, because the article focuses on lifespan in the present day
No, because the sentence illustrates the change in lifespan
No, because the article focuses on lifespan over the past century

What is the difference between a supreme court opinion and a supreme court dissent? guys answer asap

M read the sentence.what best describes the underlined part of the sentence,and why? alma plans to visit london and paris, where her parentswent on their first trip together as a married couple.it is a restrictive relative clause because it begins with arelative pronoun, has both a subject and a verb, and is notnecessary to the meaning of the sentence.it is a nonrestrictive relative clause because it begins witha relative pronoun, has both a subject and a verb, and isnecessary to the meaning of the sentence.it is a restrictive relative clause because it begins with arelative pronoun, has both a subject and a verb, and isnecessary to the meaning of the sentence.it is a nonrestrictive relative clause because it begins witha relative pronoun, has both a subject and a verb, and isnot necessary to the meaning of the sentence.

Read the passage. which statement would be the best summary to give the argument meaningful context? a. the passage is fine the way it is. b.th word "debate" should be removed, because it indicates disagreement. c. the word "claim" should be removed because this is not the claim. d. the sentence that begins " i personally believe" should be removed because it shows bias.