In what way would a television's live report from the scene of a war differ from a book written about the war years later?
A. The television reporter would have the ability to speak to more
sources about the subject.
B. The television reporter would have more thorough information
than the writer of the book.
C. The book would provide a more objective assessment of the
events.
D. Historical context would provide the book's account with a better
sense of how important the events of the day were.

It is more likely that the live TV report on the war would be more accurate than a written account of the event AFTER it happened. Explanation: It is more difficult for people to accurately remember details as time passes. The more years go by, the less people will remember

the answer is b) ''i hereby express my profound remorse together with my sincere mourning ''.

the reason being that although all of the options provided are valid the main idea of the speech by prime minister junichiro koizumi is to express his and japan's current antiwar pledge.

he states that 59 years had passed since the war, he acknowledges the 3 million japanese that lost their lives during the war and those countries who were affected by their decisions, as well as the way japan intends to develop relationships across the globe however all of this can be summarize to how japan as a whole regrets the war and its consecuences.

hope this ! i found the article on let me know if i'm using the wrong one.

the author wants to draw the reader deeper into the experiences.