English, 02.06.2021 05:30 oliwia0765

Hi, this is due in a cople of hours can someone help me please. Thank you!! Questions:
1)What does it means « commanding to one’s own understanding « mean ?
2) why would men be incapable ?
3. What is “beyond the reach and competence of politics”.
4.a. ) What are the different elements of individual existence that require tolerance to be exercised towards them?
b.) In what precisely does "the tolerance perfect rancidity of the state?
5) from the answers before, identify the guiding of the text and the stages of the argumentation.

Text by John locke, A letter concerning toleration.
Furthermore, no man can give another power over something over which he himself has no power, and even God would do so in vain. Now, whether a man is incapable of commanding his own understanding, or of deciding positively today of the opinion he will have tomorrow, this is clearly demonstrated by experience and very nature of the understanding, which can no longer apprehend things other than they appear to it only the eye is capable of seeing the rainbow of other colors than those which it sees there only. these are really there or not.
The other thing that has a legitimate right to limitless tolerance is the place, the time and modalities of divine worship, for this is a matter that takes place exclusively between God and me; it engages my eternal destiny, and it is beyond the reach and the competence of politics and government, which are only intended to provide my well-being in this world; the government can do me justice towards my neighbor, but he cannot defend me against my God. Whatever evils I may endure when I obey him in other areas, he will be able to compensate me for it: but if he forces me to adhere to a false religion, he will not be able to make any redress to me in this regard. world. Let me add that, even in the things of this world over which the magistrate has authority, he never enjoins men to take care of their civil or private affairs: he never compels them to provide for their own interests. beyond what is necessary to the public good, and it would be unfair if it did; he is content to ensure that his interests are neither injured nor invaded by other men, which is perfect tolerance.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 23:30

Wichita mourning david matherne pipe organs—dusty and tarnished— bellowed the ancient song, as movers carried the pews for one last time. frozen branches—heavy with ice arms— 5 couldn’t perform their dance, as workmen shuffled inside the worn-out floors. sally richards—broken and mourning— watched while her father left, 10 as painters brought in their cans for the first time. stained-glass windows—buckled and broken— surveyed commotion’s cause as commerce won in the end 15 yet one more time. reverend richards—feeble and finished— cried as his exit was lost on christians who worshiped the dime; a change of the times. 20 which of these best summarizes the author's style in this poem? a) each of the five stanzas contains internal rhyme and consistent rhythm. b) each of the five stanzas contains an end rhyme describing a different character. c) each of the five stanzas contains assonance followed by a dash, then a description of the old church. d) each of the five stanzas introduces a character followed by a dash, then a description of that character. 3) in the first line of each stanza, the author follows the pattern of a noun followed by a pair of adjectives. what is the purpose of this pattern? a) the author hopes to create a peaceful feeling for the readers. b) the object and its adjectives are used to create a sense of progress. c) the author uses the pattern to create vivid pictures in the reader's mind. d) the author uses the pattern of man and nature to show the impact of this event.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 23:50

Pls, i really need on this question?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:30

Read the following passage: he roamed from chamber to chamber with hurried, unequal, and objectless step. the pallor of his countenance had assumed, if possible, a more ghastly hue— but the luminousness of his eye had utterly gone out. the once occasional huskiness of his tone was heard no more; and a tremulous quaver, as if of extreme terror, habitually characterized his utterance. there were times, indeed, when i thought his unceasingly agitated mind was laboring with some oppressive secret, to divulge which he struggled for the necessary courage. which of the above ideas might be considered foreshadowing? he is wandering all over the chamber his skin tone is really pale his voice is quivering the narrator thinks he is laboring with an oppressive secret

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 10:00

Ineed . read the passage, and choose the two (2) inferences that are most firmly based on the given information. up through the 1700s, many europeans believed that a king’s touch could cure diseases. at his coronation in 1775, for example, king louis the sixteenth of france touched 2,400 of his ailing subjects. 1. the touch of a king truly has special healing power others do not have 2. there had been other kings of france named louis. 3. french coronations were public events. 4. the french suffered

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Hi, this is due in a cople of hours can someone help me please. Thank you!! Questions:
1)What...

Questions