Pft dfwbdsdybeyhfc8sgyfb he funny O. o
Anyway am bor/ed any. one wanna talk... :3

She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.

What inference can the reader make about montresor’s feelings based on the passage above? montresor feels good will towards fortunato. montresor is now indifferent towards fortunato. montresor is bent on taking revenge against fortunato. montresor wishes something bad would happen to fortunato.

Which statement best explains how shakespeare transformed thesource material, hecatommithi by giraldi cinthio? lago is driven by a sense of duty, while ensign is motivatedby jealousyensign's plot only involves the moor, while lago plots to trickcassio, the captainwhile ensign's trickery is driven by his love for the moor'swife, lago's plot is driven by his hatred for cassio and themoorin shakespeare's play, the men are either good or evil bynature, in the source material, they are influenced by outsidesources