Rima is a poor girl. She work's in a rich man's house. Her master was a good man. But the mistress was very inconsiderate. One day while serving tea, rima broke a tea cup. So, her mistress

Hi. I believe you want this story to be complemented. So, I hope the answer below can help you.

One day while serving tea, rhyme broke a tea cup. So, her mistress, possessed of rage, grabbed her by the arm and shook her violently as she yelled, "Clumsy! You broke the cup that was given to me by my parents, you does not deserve forgiveness."

The mistress took her hand to hit Rima violently. Rima, already waiting for the impact she would receive from the slap, closed her eyes tightly and turned her face to the side. There was nothing she could do to defend herself and the fear and anxiety made her cry violently as she whispered apologies.

While waiting for the slap she would receive, Rima noticed that her master entered the room and grabbed her wife's hand, who pushed Rima to the floor and started screaming about how much Rima should be punished. The master asked his wife to calm down and said that hitting the poor girl would not bring the cup back and asked the wife not to give so much importance to material things, especially when they can be replaced.

He walked towards Rima, lifted her off the ground and asked her to stop crying because no one would harm her. Rima was still very scared, but grateful for the master's words.

He asked Rima to go to the kitchen and asked another girl to serve the tea.

Still sad and shaken, Rima obeyed him and on her way to the kitchen, she thanked God, in silent prayer, for living with a man as wise as the master.

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.