subject
English, 10.06.2021 21:20 queenlover9975

In this passage, there are some aspects that make a genuine simile in one version, but not so much so in the other. Find the difference in meaning between the two versions, and then in no less than 150 words, explain that difference, commenting on how translation may have influenced the variation.


In this passage, there are some aspects that make a genuine simile in one version, but not so much

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:30
Did franklin achieve the virtues of humility?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:50
If music be the food of love, play on; give me excess of it, that, surfeiting, the appetite may sicken, and so die. that strain again! it had a dying fall: o, it came o'er my ear like the sweet sound, that breathes upon a bank of violets, stealing and giving odour! now read the excerpt from "the love song of j. alfred prufrock." for i have known them all already, known them all: have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons, i have measured out my life with coffee spoons; i know the voices dying with a dying fall beneath the music from a farther room. what does the phrase "dying fall" most likely mean in both excerpts
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 14:30
It is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. . among the wonderful deeds of hannibal this one is enumerated: that having led an enormous army, composed of many various races of men, to fight in foreign lands, no dissensions arose either among them or against the prince, whether in his bad or in his good fortune. this arose from nothing else than his inhuman cruelty, which, with his boundless valour, made him revered and terrible in the sight of his soldiers, but without that cruelty, his other virtues were not sufficient to produce this effect. –the prince, niccolò machiavelli what kind of reasoning does machiavelli use in this excerpt? he uses inductive reasoning because he offers statistics to prove his claim. he uses inductive reasoning because he observes a pattern and proves a conclusion. he uses deductive reasoning because he relies on scientific experiments to prove a conclusion. he uses deductive reasoning because he introduces a conclusion and proves it with evidence.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:00
This dust was once the manthis dust was once the man,gentle, plain, just and resolute, under whose cautious hand,against the foulest crime in history known in any land or age,was saved the union of these states walt whitman who is "the man" the dust now represents? the narrator a criminal whitman lincoln
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In this passage, there are some aspects that make a genuine simile in one version, but not so much s...
Questions
question
SAT, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Arts, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Arts, 24.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 24.05.2021 16:20
Questions on the website: 13722362