Prompt How to evaluate an author’s argument 1. It needs to be at least 5 sentences long. 2. In the first sentence state the author, title, and what they are trying to prove (claim). 3. In the next couple sentences, summarize the main points from the article. 4. Give some of the evidence that the author is using to prove the points. 5. For the last couple of sentences, you need to evaluate the evidence. Does the evidence support the author's claim? Is the evidence stated directly and logical or does the evidence not support the claim? Is the evidence relevant and sufficient? ***After taking the notes, please type in the box, I read and understand how to evaluate an author’s argument. I don't understand what there asking

Ow does the author reveal katina's initial excitement about her internship? a) by showing how katina responds to conflict b) by describing how katina felt at the end of the day c) by showing how katina interacts with other characters d) by describing how katina selected her clothes with care

"where are you taking me? " the car hesitated, or rather gave a faint whirring click, as if information, somewhere, was dropping card by punch- slotted card under electric eyes. "to the psychiatric center for research on regressive tendencies." he got in. the door shut with a soft thud. the police car rolled through the night avenues, flashing its dim lights ahead. which statement best describes the intended aesthetic impact of this excerpt? o a. by showing leonard obeying the police car, the author reinforces the theme of surrendering one s individuality. o b. by relating the way the car responds, the author underscores the theme of the dangers of a mechanized of society o c. by having leonard, a seemingly normal person, taken to a psychiatric center, the author injects irony, leaving the reader surprised o d. by showing leonard communicating with another person, the author satisfies his need for human contact, leaving the reader hopeful

How does the author foreshadow trouble in the prison? support your answer with explicit textual evidence