How do the fallacies in the first passage differ from the fallacies in the second?

How do the fallacies in the first passage differ from the fallacies in the second?

Explanation:

Passage 1 contains an ad hominem attack, while passage 2 contains a false dilemma. ... Passage 1 contains an appeal to emotion, while passage 2 contains an ad hominem attack.

if this isnt a true or false than they have equal amount of importants

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)