Which statement best analyzes the rebuttal? It is effective because it uses fair and unbiased logic to present a flaw in the counterclaim.
It is effective because it sets an authoritative tone incorporating strong reasoning.
It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.
It is ineffective because it does not acknowledge any part of the counterclaim

It is ineffective because it does not provide a logical reason for opposing the counterclaim.

Explanation:

In the given claim, counterclaim, and rebuttal, the main issue discussed is that of allowing children to play video games. The claim made is that children become violent from playing violent games.

The counterclaim, on the other claim, presents that they are allowed to play any game they want "under adult supervision". The rebuttal then presents the idea that allowing children only gives them unnecessary authority.

The rebuttal presented is ineffective as it failed to provide any logical reasoning for opposing the counterclaim.

Thus, the correct answer is the third option.

my guy how are we supposed to know

the sentence that avoid faulty coordination is:

culture, which is well represented in philadelphia, plays a major role including theatre, music, and the visual arts.  

faulty coordination occurs when the writer gives equal importance two different ideas (clauses) which in fact are not equivalent. in order to correct a misplaced clause or idea, the writer can place less important or emphatic ideas in a relative clause as in the previous sentence.