English, 30.06.2021 05:10 BigGirlsTheBest

Compare and contrast the dangerous game essay

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: samoc22

Explanation:

“The world is made up of two classes- the hunters and the hunted.” This famous quote can be found in Richard Connell’s short story The Most Dangerous Game. This quote is also mentioned in the film version of this short story. This is one of the similarities between these two versions. However, there are also differences between the two, including characters besides the two main, Robert Rainsford, and General Zaroff, plot events, setting, and resolution. The most differences are in the categories of characters, and plot events. Without some similarities in these two categories, the storyline would be altered.For the most part, the plot must stay the same, or the storyline will fall apart. Most of the events in the story occur in the visual as well. For instance, in both versions, Zaroff had never lost a hunt until Rainsford came along. In the written version, Zaroff had killed multiple people in his hunt until Rainsford swam to his island, was challenged, and eventually killed Zaroff, to stop him from his “hunting”. The same idea is applied in the movie. Another example of plot similarities, is that Rainsford sets the same traps in both versions of The Most Dangerous Game. In both interpretations of the story, when Rainsford is challenged to the hunting game by Zaroff, he sets a sapling trap, a hole trap, and a sand trap. Despite these and many more similarities, there are also notable differences in the two storylines. One example of a great difference is that there is a time difference in the versions of the story. In the book, Rainsford is challenged to survive for three days while being hunted by Zaroff. On the contrary, in the visual, Rainford is only challenged to survive for six hours, and must hunt with Eve. Another rather large difference between the two, is that Zaroff dies because of different causes and reasons. In the story, Rainsford hides in Zaroff’s bedroom and waits to kill him, which would be considered a pre-planned murder. While in the motion picture, Zaroff tries to shoot Rainsford.

Answer from: Quest

can you put a picture you cant really send us to a site.

Answer from: Quest

t deuhje dttfcr6 un5 utru rt 67r

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 18:30

What does the author see as the main cause for why students don’t really see shakespeare as a real, flawed human being? we shouldn’t shy away from discussing our literary heroes’ flaws. if nothing else, the knowledge of their failures us appreciate what success and greatness these authors did achieve. often our hero-worship keeps us from truly seeing the complexity of a great author. thus, i would argue, nothing would be better for high school students than to take shakespeare down a peg or two. a) the fact that students never learn enough about shakespeares biography b) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s comedies while in school c) the fact that students are never assigned to read any shakespeare while in high school d) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s greatest works in school and thus never see his weaknesses

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:00

How are montag and faber opposites of each other? a) montag is a firefighter, therefore it is his job to burn books. faber used to be and english professor, and it was his job to teach students about books. b) montag is passionate and determined, and farber is wise and cautious c) montag is brave enough to steal and illegal book. faber was too afraid to speak up when books started to become illegal. d) all of the answer choices are correct

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 05:00

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 09:30

How does the author use word choice to show her point of view on the use of pesticides against insects?

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Compare and contrast the dangerous game essay...

Questions