Joseph Conrad has been seen by many scholars as progressive because his work criticizes the practices of colonialism. However, as Chinua Achebe points out, his presentation of Africa and African people is deeply problematic. In your opinion, is Achebe right? Is Conrad a 'bloody racist?' Should we continue to read his work? Is there still value to discussing the valid critiques of colonialism present in his work, considering the other problematic aspects?

a is the indefinite article

the passage can be best described as: "the british legislature extended an unwarranted jurisdiction".

we can say that because the text clearly states how the people of the colonies warned the british about their excessive desire to rule over them, without taking into consideration the difficulties their brothers had experienced in america: they struggled to establish the colonies, to adapt to new types of weather, fight with the natives, etc., and how they now see (or then saw) the only way out was to cut all ties with the british, since they ignored the people's petitions.

based on the graph, people who are asian/ pacific islander, are better at math than the other race/ethnicity's on the graph.