Which example of peer feedback for a work of narrative fiction is most effective?

A. Some of the story elements are good, but most of the things in the
story are bad or just O. K.

B. This story may be effective, but it belongs to the horror genre, which is the least creative genre.

C. Instead of writing a love story, you should have written a story
about a sea captain and his crew.

D. I wanted a better sense of the setting. What does the character see, hear, smell, and feel?
SOS

1. the details that would clarify the authors purpose for writing would be after the "haley collected used soccer jersey and sent them to guatemalan children." part, he would say, "and you can also donate today to save ". so far in the text, you can see no such thing. if, near the end the author persuades you to donate to guatemalans, then you know that the author's reason to write is to persuade you.

2. what details would make the text more engaging is to see the guatemalan children's reaction to getting free jerseys.

3. the details that convey the author's attitude would be an opinion by the author, for example, if he said, "haley was a very nice girl " or, you can find the attitude by finding parts of haley's personality that he highlights. you can strengthen your tones by using more descriptive words, and simplify long sentences as much as you can.

you're welcome ; p

because they were not just any seashells they were sally's seashells

ed brushes his teeth

explanation: