Read the paragraph from "1906 Marked the Dawn of the Scientific Revolution." The 1906 earthquake marked the dawn of modern scientific study of the San Andreas fault system in California.
Before 1906, earthquake research in the U. S. had advanced slowly compared to efforts in Japan and Europe.
The first seismographs in the U. S. were installed in 1887, at the Lick Observatory (Mount Hamilton, California)
and at the University of California at Berkeley. Around the turn of the century, a small number of geology
professors at U. S. universities and geologists working for the U. S. Geological Survey contributed some of the
earliest observations of earthquake-related features and compiled the earliest lists of historic earthquakes in
the U. S. Relatively little was understood at the time about earthquakes, how and where they occurred, or the
hazard they would present to our westward-bound, expanding nation. The theory of plate tectonics was still
more than a half-century away.
A central idea of this article is that studying the 1906 earthquake led to great advances in earthquake science. How
does this paragraph develop that idea?
1906 Marked the Dawn of the Scientific Revolution
It describes the experience that the scientists had before the 1906 earthquake.
It identifies the equipment that the scientists would use in the 1906 study.
o It engages readers by making the California earthquake scientists seem like underdogs.
It contrasts the study with the relatively primitive science that came before it.

1906 Marked the Dawn of the Scientific Revolution

Explanation:

A 1906 earthquake ushered in the modern scientific investigation of California's San Andreas fault system. Before 1906, US earthquake studies trailed behind Japan and Europe. On Mount Hamilton in California, the first seismographs were placed in 1887. U.S. college geology professors and USGS geologists made some of the first findings of earthquake-related features about 1900. Eruptive events were unknown to our westward-expanding country at the time. Plate tectonics was still decades distant.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.