Often, writers use rhetoric, or persuasive language, to help them convince readers that what they are saying is believable and right. This is especially true about speakers like Jonathan Edwards. Return to the sermon and look for places where Edwards is trying to use powerful, persuasive, and figurative language in order to have an emotional impact on those who were listening to it. What specific words and phrases are designed to affect the audience? What was that intended effect? Does this language help Edwards seem more persuasive, or make his point clearer? Why or why not? Be sure to use specific evidence from the sermon to support your assertions. I NEED HELP

yes

explanation:

to inform readers about the ways young people improve the world.

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.

c i took the test and ig: is @yfw.madison

explanation: