subject
English, 27.08.2021 16:10 dbhuggybearow6jng

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this story was written for children?
O The story is set in a forest.
The battle was won by a trick.
O The excerpt describes a battle.
The characters are talking animals.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 22:30
Who is ¨ the guilty party¨ at the end of the text, and how do his actions contribute to the storys theme?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:00
Me read the letter. dear aunt mary, you for the wonderful painting. you are so talented! i was thrilled that you chose to paint horses. you must have remembered that i was crazy about horses when i was a little kid—and i still love them. i have hung the painting in my room so that i can see it every morning when i wake up. your loving niece, celia what makes this letter appropriate for its intended audience? it is written from the third-person point of view. it is concise and impersonal. its sentence structure is varied. its language is informal.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:50
Brutus: but as he was ambitious, i slew him. . who is here so base that would be a bondman? if any, speak, for him have i offended. who is here so rude that would not be a roman? if any, speak, for him have i offended. who is here so vile that will not love his country? if any, speak, for him have i offended. i pause for a reply. which rhetorical device does brutus use in this excerpt?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:10
What if the author had used “looked at” instead? punishment would be deemphasized. punishments would be seen as less harsh. the meaning wouldn't change.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this story was written for children?
O The...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.12.2019 13:31
Questions on the website: 13722367