Deep within the walls of the old house I heard a rumble that felt like an earthquake. 2. In the end, the entire Usher family was , and nothing was left.

3. On the table was a large silver bowl with a long, crooked that ran all the way across its bottom edge.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

i am doing the essay dont worry i just need the points

btw we cant do your essays.

here, maybe this will be more -

singular:

first person- i, me, my, mine

second person- you, your, yours

third person- he, she, him, it, his, her, hers

plural:

first person- we, us , our, ours

second person- you, your, yours

third person- they, them, their, theirs.

but the answrer is a. first person.