Please help me answer all of these questions in this article ASAP. The Meat Market by Alex Tabarrok

1. What, according to Tabarrok, is “the great paradox of deceased donation”?

2. What positive developments in the last several decades have “led to fewer potential brain-dead donors than in the past”?

3. How has Iran eliminated shortages in transplanted?

4. How do Singapore and Israel promote donation without using financial compensation?

5. What is your reaction to the title and opening of the essay?

6. Although he mentions the dividing line between life and death, he avoids discussing the issue in the essay. Do you think this strengthens or weakens his argument?

7. Tabarrok is an economist. How does his background influence the way he approaches the subject?

8. Do you think that paying for organs in unethical? Why or why not?

1. Indeed, the great paradox of deceased donation is that we must draw the line between life and death precisely where we cannot be sure of the answer, because the line must lie where the donor is dead but the donor's organs are not.

2. Brain death has been reduced as a result of improved automotive safety and reduced crime.

3. The adoption of the legalized and compensated living-unrelated donor renal transplant program in 1988 eliminated the need for Iranian patients for commercial or illegal paid transplants abroad.

4. Singapore is preparing to pay donors as much as 50,000 ... Israel is implementing a "no give, no take"

5. You do this part :)

6. It's a weakens because that's the whole point. (Add more to this if you'd like)

7. Tabarrok understands the ways in which financial factors drive people and shape society in a way that physicians or members of the clergy may not. He looks at things more logically and focuses on the idea of supply and demand and uses this perspective to think of ways in which the organ donation system could be improved, which works well for him.

8. Whatever the context, compensation for organs is illegal under Section 301 of the National Organ Transplant Act: “It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration” (Public Law 98-507).

answer

answer: a: they can affect the author’s perspective and in turn the theme and purpose for the writing.

the author's background and time period greatly affect the text that the author produces. this is because we are all a reflection of our time period and background. depending on where and when we were born, we will find some questions more important than others. for example, if we are a wealthy person born in medieval times, we will most likely be interested in courtly love and stories of knights and honour. however, if we are born in the 20th century in africa, we might instead focus on colonialism and its effects on the newly liberated countries. the theme and the purpose of writing are both affected by these conditions.

explanation:

me before you gives us insight of life meaning in unique way. it answers question about what kind of life you want and people’s struggle to be in the ideal condition of worth living. the author, jojo moyes, was intrigued by the case of daniel james who persuaded to end his life after suffering for years.

it begins with louisa clark, a girl with boring life, lose her job at the café and start to stand on her feet by applying job as a private carer of disable man. the near location and the money they offer push her to come to the castle where the interview conducted. she was doubted by camilla traynor, a mother of quadriplegic man, with her inexperience but somehow, she is fully gain employed by camilla and her husband, steven traynor.

on the other hand, will traynor, the disable man louisa take care of, is not an easy man to catch. he has sharp comments with everything she has done and seems unreachable. as time passed by, will become more open to louisa and they start to communicate better. that is until will has his sister, georgina, visited.

brainliest .