Read the following gnome again. Then reflect on (or read again) the Biblical account of Cain and Abel in Genesis. Tell whether you agree with the opinion of the author (shown in bold type) that the resentment Cain had for Abel was a long-lasting hatred. Explain why you think the author is correct or not. Hostility has been among mankind

even since the earth swallowed the blood of Abel,

That was not the hatred of a day

from which wicked drops of blood sprang far and wide,

great evil to men, to many people pernicious hate.

Cain slew his own brother whom death carried off;

far and wide was it known then

that lasting hate injured men, so citizens.

God then told Cain, “The sacrifice that your brother Abel gave was valuable to him and he loved it too. Now you don't need to be jealous of your brother. If you do what is right then you will always be happy, but if you do the wrong things, you will have to be sad.The story of Abraham and Isaac helps us understand how hard it must have been for God the Father to give Jesus to die for us. It wasn't easy for Him to let Jesus die in our place. Remember, there wasn't anyone or anything to take Jesus' place when He died for us, like there had been for Isaac.

Explanation:

true

Explanation:

you harly even have 1,278 followers but your following 4,983 which means 3705 people are not really into what you post. what i recommend to do is to ask them what they would like to see and i recommend to be safer on what you post. stay safe and dont use a homework website to boost you followers.

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.