learning task 5: look for a good sample of an argumentative text in english tabloids or broadsheets published here in the philipines. cut the said sample out and paste it in your notebook. examine the text, then answer the questions that follow. 1. what is the main argument presented in the sample you have chosen? how was it presented 2. what the cons and pros were presented? enumerate. 3. how did the writer conclude the text?. 4. what can you say about the use of language features like modals, evaluative words and transitional devices in the text? how did these elements contribute to the achievement of the writer's purpose?

anyone who was dealing with communism in soviet union in his time had an ideal picture of equality, freedom, the struggle of the working class for a better future, the success of the aristocracy's overthrow and the emancipation of subjugation.   however, anyone who would go to soviet union to see the functioning of the communist system, would be convinced that it was about sad people, about everyday bad life, about the brutal attitude of communist leaders, about ill obsession to completely exterminate every thought on aristocracy. thus, orwell wanted to show all the absurdity, the brutality of the system, the unbearable rule of suspicious morality, the ignorant people who try to play professionally.

the answers are: b. and e.

the eye wink at the hand; yet let that be / which the eye fears, when it is done, to see.

i dont know i didnt take the test

to refer to another writer's ideas in the course of making your own original statement. when you use a summary in the course of your own writing, you must use your be used in book reviews (see chapter 8), in essays of analysis (see, nection between sentences, and you can create new paragraphs to reflect