B- Scenario analysis (4 points) (Word limit: 50-70 words) of
stion
Richard, an Australian, is part of a team of lawyers based in Paris. Claude, 48, is the team's
PA. Claude works from 9 a. m. to 6 p. m., with an hour and a half for lunch. Richard is very
pleased with the quality of Claude's, work and her commitment to the team. Unfortunately
because of his extensive travel commitments abroad, he has never had the opportunity to
have lunch with her or spend any time with her and the team outside the work environment.
After a while, Richard asks to be addressed by his first name. Several months later, however,
Claude is still calling him 'Monsieur Lafleur' and addressing him with Voulez-vous bien..."
although Richard calls her 'Claude' and addresses her with Veux-tu.
Richard is puzzled and decides to talk to Claude about this matter in order to clarify the
situation. To his amazement, Claude replies that she prefers to call him by his surname and
refer to him with the formal vous.
How would you explain these differences in terms of Hofstede's cultural dimensions
and communication styles?

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

you can use this site to summarize your ideas, exotic animals do not make good pets.

ye

explanation:

i would need the available options to be listed to give you an answer.