How is immigration now in the us the same as immigration in the 1900s? PLEASE HELP THIS ESSAY IS DUE TONIGHT IN 2 HOURS (11PM)

Can you mark me as Brainliest Please  

Explanation:

The proponents of mass immigration claim that we should not worry about it, since it's not worse than the Great Wave of immigration at the turn of the century. Nevertheless, because of greatly changing times in the last hundred years, immigration now does not correspond to our country's needs as it did at the turn of the last century.

As a result of rapid industrialization during the Gilded Age, low-skilled workers were highly employable. As a result of new mechanical devices and processes, workers with special skills and knowledge no longer needed to be employed. The U.S. Industrial Commission: “The division of labor and the use of machinery can facilitate both the use of cheap labor and the use of machinery as a result of the entry of unskilled immigrants.” However, modern technology does not require unskilled workers. Yet, in 2001, only 16 percent of legal immigrants were admitted as skilled workers.

Immigration may have had some marginal fiscal benefits before 1900. Today, the estimated annual net cost of each immigrant, on average, is $2700. Then, immigrants' stay in the U.S. was often Immigration today is permanent, not temporary. The Immigration and Naturalization Service estimates that the rate of return from 1900 to 1904 was over 37 percent 3; in the 1990s, the rate of immigrants' return to their homelands was a much lower 15 percent. 4

66666666

explanation:

i think the life is invaluable.

you can also say immeasurable.