subject
English, 05.12.2021 21:40 dominiqueallen23

Labor-Management Legislation As some have noted, business opposed early efforts to organize labor. The federal government generally
supported anti-union efforts through the court system, and in some cases federal troops were used to end
strikes. Generally, however, the government began to correct this imbalance through the legislative process.
Norris-LaGuardia Act
The first major piece of legislation to secure rights for unions, the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932, was
considered a landmark in labor management relations. This act made it difficult for businesses to obtain
court orders that banned strikes, picketing, or union membership drives. Previously, courts had issued such
orders readily as a means of curbing these activities.
National Labor Relations Act
The National Labor Relations Act, also known as the Wagner Act, was passed by Congress in 1935. It
established procedures by which employees decide whether they want to be represented by a union. If
workers choose to be represented, the Wagner Act requires management to negotiate with union
representatives. The Wagner Act also forbids certain unfair labor practices on the part of management, such
as firing or punishing workers because they are pro-union, spying on union meetings, and bribing employees
to vote against unionization.
Finally, the Wagner Act established the National Labor Relations board (NLRB) to enforce the provisions
of the law. The NLRB is primarily concerned with 1) overseeing the elections in which employees decided
whether they will be represented by a union and 2) investigating complaints lodged by union or employees.
For example, believing Wal-Mart management was treating their union organizing activities unfairly, some
employees of that company took their grievance to the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB made a
ruling against Wal-Mart for improperly restricting the efforts of union organizers. Wal-Mart was forced to
allow the employees to post union informatinn the comnany's hullati

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:30
June and sylvio speak to mr. teller in the driveway of their farmhouse. it is raining hard, and they all carry umbrellas. a dog sits on the steps of the house. june: we didn’t think you’d be coming back for the puppy. mr. teller: i said i would when i dropped the puppy off. sylvio: yes, but that was months ago. we thought you’d be back for the puppy in a couple days. now she’s a full-grown dog. we have raised her ourselves, we built her her own doghouse, and we love her. mr. teller: but she’s my dog. i only dropped her off at your house for safekeeping since i had to go out of town on business. now i’m back and i want my dog back. what is the setting of this play? a basket a farm a doghouse a trip
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:50
How can the rebuttal best address the counterclaim? read the claim and reason beginning in high school students should eam their own money by finding aher school employment. an aber school job seves not only as income, but as valuable experience for when students leave school for the workiorce. read the counterclaim and reason while having a source of income can certainly be a learning experience for high school students, they should maintain their focus on academics and extracurricular activities working atter school many experts agree, can lead to a decrease in school success which can then limit students' options when they enter the workforce the rebuttal should include examples of jobs that are available to students and the problems associated with those jobs the rebuttal should acknowledge that school remains a priority and discuss the benefits of a balance between school and work the rebuttal should address the need for a discussion on the matter by restating both points before reaching a conclusion the rebuttal should state a logical explanation for both opinions before granting credibility to the need for school to remain a priority
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
What is the phrase a tiny shoot of phase prikled by the mind
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Labor-Management Legislation As some have noted, business opposed early efforts to organize labor....
Questions
question
History, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
History, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 14.01.2021 14:00
question
English, 14.01.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722362