What stance does the author take about virtual reality's ability to be "real"? What specific points does he make to support his claim?
What counterclaim(s) does the author acknowledge?
Why include the detail of the blindfolding experiment and the
students' reactions? Does it change your opinion of such an
experience? Why or why not?
The author states, "Nobody thinks that going downtown without
your wallet will make you appreciate poverty - why should these
simulations do any better?". Clearly he believes that the VR
experience isn't valid for truly engaging in empathy with refugees.
What do you think and why?
How does the author close the article, and what effect does that
have? (Consider the last three paragraphs/sections).
5.