The philosopher Peter Singer argues that universal hunger and poverty issues would come to an end if the world's wealthy gave back any money, funds, or capital they did not use or need. That
there is no need for luxury items or vast investments that do not benefit others.
In his New York Times Magazine article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty," the author calls
for the developed world to immediately come to the realization that it wastes a good deal of
money and resources that would otherwise help lesser nations. Write an essay in which you
explore the positives and negatives of this argument. Listed below are some ideas from the essay
that you should embed into your response.

word count 168

serve the people! ,” smoothly translated by julia lovell, offers an initial sample of yan lianke’s writing to an english-speaking audience. a bluntly drawn, mildly erotic fable, it teases mao zedong by poking fun at a true believer who obeys the chairman’s precepts too literally. to a western sensibility, the broad strokes of yan lianke’s humor would seem to pose little risk of inciting rebellion, whether of the flesh or of the body politic. but then, part of the book’s attraction is that it doesn’t have a western sensibility. it lets the reader see — or rather, intuit — what jokes chinese officials don’t consider funny, and how very little it takes for a writer to be branded an incendiary in 21st-century china, more than three decades after the death of mao, a decade after the death of deng xiaoping and seven years since china entered the world trade organization, a move that would seem to signal a willingness (however wary) to mingle with the rest of the world.

why? ? and you will probably get ban

explanation:

yes a mod can probably ban you, and will if you continue to spam. i don't know why you would want to be ban.