PLZ HELP NO LINKS PLZ AND THANK YOU
TEXT 1 Tut Mystery Finally Solved? by Ann Ching
Feb...
PLZ HELP NO LINKS PLZ AND THANK YOU
TEXT 1 Tut Mystery Finally Solved? by Ann Ching
February 16, 2010
1 Ever since scientists discovered a bone fragment in King Tut’s
skull, there has been speculation that the boy king was
murdered. But other, more reliable evidence suggests that he was
simply a frail young man who had a severe form of malaria, and
suffered a leg fracture, all of which likely combined to cause
his death.
2 First of all, Tut most likely had genetic disorders. Researchers
have examined the DNA of Tut and several other famous
Egyptian mummies. The tests show that Tut’s father was the
controversial pharaoh Akhenaten. They also confirmed that
Akhenaten married his sister, a practice common in the royal
family because they believed it preserved their divine status.
This pairing was the likely cause of Tut’s genetic issues.
3 There is also evidence that Tut suffered from a disorder that
weakened areas of the bone. Detailed CT scans of Tut’s mummy
revealed that he had a cleft palate. The scans also revealed an
abnormally curved spine and a toe malformation that would
have caused pain and swelling. This sheds new light on the
100 or so canes found in Tut’s tomb—he probably needed them
to walk.
4 DNA tests on the mummy have also shown that disease may
have been a third factor contributing to Tut’s demise. The tests
revealed signs of a parasite that causes a severe form of malaria.
This indicates that Tut suffered from this terrible disease.
5 Put together, the evidence paints a clear picture of a young
man weakened by genetic disorders and disease. So, despite the
more intriguing idea that Tut was murdered, it’s much more
likely that he was just a very sick boy who died of natural
causes. Science and technology will confirm this sad tale and
finally solve this fascinating mystery
TEXT 2
A Case for Ancient Murder by Juan Moya
October 7, 2002
1 Since the 1922 discovery of the tomb of the pharaoh
Tutankhamen, better known as King Tut, people have been
fascinated by the young ruler, who was just 19 when he died. His
tomb and some of its contents suggest that his death was sudden
and unexpected. But was it illness, accident . . . or murder? If we
look at the evidence, it becomes fairly obvious that the boy king
met with foul play.
2 Tut’s mummy was damaged during its removal from the coffin
and casings, and the first expert to examine it in 1925 found no
obvious cause of death. However, when the body was X-rayed in
1968, a key piece of evidence was discovered: a piece of bone
floating inside Tut’s skull. Experts believed it could be evidence
of a fatal blow to the back of the young pharaoh’s head.
3 There were certainly people close to Tut who would have
benefited from having the king out of the way. Greg Cooper, a
former FBI profiler and police chief, and Mike King, head of a
police crime-analysis unit, have focused on a few key suspects:
Tut’s chief treasurer, his military commander, his wife, and his
prime minister.
4 Through the use of forensic science, and by studying historical
records and evidence from the tomb, Cooper and King were able
to rule out all suspects except Tut’s prime minister, Ay. Cooper
and King concluded that Ay had the most to gain from
Tutankhamen’s death since Ay went on to rule as pharaoh.
5 Whether or not it was Ay who killed Tut is still being debated,
but we can be fairly certain that the young pharaoh was indeed
murdered. Further investigations and technological advances
will soon prove that the young pharaoh did not succumb to a
tragic illness or an unfortunate accident. And even after over
3,000 years, the truth deserves to be known
1 Which fact about Tutankhamen do the two accounts agree on, but
interpret differently?
A He broke his leg not long before he died.
B He died when he was only 19 years old.
C He had damage to the back of his skull.
D His tomb was discovered in Egypt in 1922
2 Which statement best summarizes how Moya’s and Ching’s ideas
conflict?
A They disagree on who gained from Tut’s death.
B They disagree on the timing of Tut’s death.
C They disagree on the best experts to consult about Tut’s death.
D They disagree on the cause of Tut’s death.
3 Explain how technological innovations have led to discoveries about
King Tut’s death. Describe how technology led the authors to draw
conflicting conclusions about King Tut’s death. Use details from each
account in your response.
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 20:00
Danny went for a long bike ride he covered at least forty miles
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
Read this excerpt from leah missbach day's foreword to wheels of change.bicycles have long played a role in my life. as a young woman, i rode one year-round before i had a car. but it was later in adulthood that the bicycle became more than a source of transportation for me. the bicycle actually began to truly shape the way i saw the world.what is the author's purpose for including this in the foreword?
Answers: 1
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
Compare and contrast the merits and drawbacks of at least two of the scholarly approaches to literature described in this unit. be sure to mention at least one advantage that each approach has over the other. use one of the readings from this unit in your comparison. your answer should be at least 250 words.
Answers: 3
English, 22.06.2019 08:00
Alberto is reading a myth. he wants to learn about the cultural context of the myth-tellers. to do so, he will write a question about each of the four aspects of cultural context. he has written the following question: what kinds of ceremonies or celebrations did the people of this culture practice? which aspect of cultural context does the question address? lifestyle setting customs values
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 23:41
History, 24.04.2020 23:41
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 23:41
History, 24.04.2020 23:41
Chemistry, 24.04.2020 23:41
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 23:41
History, 24.04.2020 23:41
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 23:41