how has the supreme court ruling on this case affected the freedom of the press since? how might things have turned out differently if the ruling favored the government?

The Supreme Court has a long history of being the chief protector of the freedom of the press. It has consistently and strongly rejected all attempts by successive governments to muzzle the media.

Sure hope this helps you

answer: fog is black

explanation:

cause idek what ur talking about and you should learn it ur self

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.