Which sentence corrects the dangling modifier in the sample sentence? after reading the whole book, the ending was unsatisfying. reading the whole book, the ending was unsatisfying. after reading the whole book, i found that the ending was unsatisfying. after reading the whole book, the ending became unsatisfying. reading the whole book, the ending was unsatisfying.

The answer to your question would be that the sentence that corrects the dangling modifier in the sample sentence is the following one: After reading the whole book, I found that the ending was unsatisfying.

Explanation:

Dangling modifers occur when the subject being modified, or described by the modifier, does not actually appear in the sentence. As the modifier has no subject in these sentences, it is said to be "dangling". The fact is that modifiers should be placed as closely to the element they are modifying. For instance, the first sentence makes it look as if the ending was the one reading the whole book. As this is impossible, you need to correct the sentence. This is done by including a subject and making sure that the modifier goes directly after the subject it is modifying, just as the revised version of the sentence shows.

b) after reading the whole book, i found the ending unsatisfying

Explanation:

e2020

:)

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

in   ¨and yet the books¨   by czelaw miloz the tone is positive since it tells us that when we touch a book, it starts to live and the perspective is in the third person and turns once into the first person. in "the rhinoceros" by eugene ionesco the tone is illogical and absurd   and the perspective is in the third person since it is a play.