subject
English, 06.07.2019 17:30 brysonbegay3400

Answer 1. read the sentence below: my english teacher was very practical. she had a lot of comma sense. which correctly explains the pun in this sentence and the word or words on which it is built? english—ironic because of the error in the sentence very—a suggestion that the opposite is true practical—teachers have little practical knowledge comma sense—a play on the phrase common sense 2. which sentence is written correctly in the imperative voice? move your car to the back parking lot to make room for the customers, . we could perhaps get more customers if the parking lot were bigger. i would have a bigger inventory if the building had a second floor. would moving your car make all that much difference at this point?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:30
Choose one group member who participated in your discussion. in 100-150 words, evaluate the effectiveness of their main argument and supporting evidence. using your notes, explain whether or not their claims were developed well, what evidence they used to support their claim, and how well they responded to the prompt. is there anything they could have done to be more effective? if so, what was it?
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
What is the claim in an argumentative text? the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:20
For frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852)1) does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. 2) how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Answer 1. read the sentence below: my english teacher was very practical. she had a lot of comma se...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 17:40
question
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 17:40
Questions on the website: 13722361