Book “into the wild” what was most likely one of krakauer’s purposes in writing two chapters about his own alaskan experience? a. to demonstrate how much better his survival skills were than mccandless’s b. to try and imagine what might have inspired mccandless c. to prove that he knows how difficult it is to survive in alaska d. to let readers know that there are many dangerous places in alaska i’m pretty sure it’s not a, but i’m having trouble choosing between the others

B; to try and imagine what might have inspired mccandless

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

if i was falling raindrop:

1. land safely (pretty sure that’s a tough one)

2. wished that time slowed down

3. a beautiful ending