Compare the interview "On the Front Lines with Thurgood Marshall" with the informational piece "'Equal Justice Under Law': Thurgood Marshall".
What key information is expanded on in the interview that is not deeply explored in the informational piece?
Responses
The interview provides a more detailed account of the Supreme Court's opinion on Brown v. Board of Education.
The interview provides a more detailed account of the Supreme Court's opinion on , Brown v. Board of Education.
The interview mentioned more about the opposition Marshall faced in the African American community.
The interview mentioned more about the opposition Marshall faced in the African American community.
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair.
The interview gives more specific examples of how segregation in education is inherently unequal and unfair.
The interview includes Marshall's own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice.
The interview includes Marshall's own struggle to get into law school which fueled his sense of injustice.

And argument does not always have to be made in words. which of the following best describes the type of argument a piece of music makes

Compare: what are the similarities and differences between "artificial flavors" and "natural flavors"? why does schlosser explain these two terms in such detail?

Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion