subject
English, 18.07.2019 14:00 kajtazi8272

Read the following scenario. you are a food server at a neighborhood restaurant. you are in a meeting with the store manager, the owner, and two other food servers. the topic of discussion is the owner’s plan for a special holiday menu. she has asked for your input on her ideas. you are concerned that the holiday menu will not appeal to vegetarians, a large segment of the restaurant’s customers. which of the following would be the most respectful way to talk about your concerns? i’ve noticed that a lot of our customers request vegetarian options. i’m wondering if this menu will appeal to them. i think you should have more vegetarian items. i think more menu options are needed. your proposed specials have too much meat. are you sure you want this menu?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
“third, all reviewers have a bias – no matter how impartial they try to be, opinions on movies are just that: opinions. this isn’t necessarily a bad thing: if you read a review by a critic that you know prefers foreign films, you know how seriously you should take his scathing critique of ironman.” according to this passage, all reviewers a. prefer foreign films c. have bias b. hated the movie ironman d. refuse to watch popular films
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:20
Which is an example of finding common ground when addressing a counter argument? a. products with genetically modified organisms (gmos) in them are frankenfoods that are unnatural, dangerous, and foul tasting. b. it’s really not important that some people feel texting while driving isn’t a big deal; it’s a fact that it’s dangerous and should be illegal. c. while both sides agree that processed foods are more convenient, the damage they do to a person’s health should not be ignored. d. testing on animals has produce several lifesaving vaccines and medicines that have saved countless human lives.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
Baca use comforting imagery. which lines have a more serious tone than the rest of the poem a. when the outside world / no longer cares if you live or die; b. so it is a pot full of yellow corn / to warm your belly in winter, c. remember. / i love you.d. it's all i have to give, / and all anyone needs to live,
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read the following scenario. you are a food server at a neighborhood restaurant. you are in a meetin...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722363