Explain how the events of the story would have been different if gilman had chosen to write in third person, or another character’s first-person point of view.

The events of the story would have been very different if it were written from the point of view of John or his sister Jane. Another character wouldn’t have been able to describe to the reader the importance of the wallpaper, and its significance would have been lost. The idea of the woman being kept in the room may have influenced the reader to perceive her differently. Without her perspective, she would have been perceived as just a troubled woman. In Gilman’s version, you sympathize with her because you are getting a firsthand account of how she feels in the room. Without her firsthand description of the room and her thoughts, it would be an entirely different story altogether.

true maby

explanation:

based on the biblical principle philippians 4: 13 "i can do everything through christ who strengthens me." i agree that it is through him that we are given the strength to cope with every situation.

and based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32 "better to get angry slowly than to be a hero. better to be even-tempered than to capture a city."   i agree with the author of the passage to the extent that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are contemptuous, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and make sure to not hurt other people and their feelings are strong people.