subject
English, 26.07.2019 04:00 milkshakegrande101

Read the following summary of the supreme court majority opinion in the tinker v. des moines case: two students wore black armbands to school to protest the vietnam war. the school district suspended the students. the supreme court determined that wearing the armbands is an expression of free speech, protected by the first amendment, and it was not disruptive in the school setting. in addition, the school had allowed other students to wear controversial symbols without suspension. if a supreme court justice were to disagree with the majority opinion, which issue would be most important in forming the dissent? a. the district feared, but could not prove, that the armbands caused disruption. b. the two students in question were under the age of 18. c. none of the other students were bothered by the armbands. d. there is precedent for schools limiting student expression.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 19:50
The travels of marco polo.what is the author’s purpose for writing this text?
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:30
How is stockton’s concept of romantic love different from checkhovs if their stories are an indication of their views
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:40
The basketball crashed against the backboard, and point guard sheena lunged for it. as she snatched the ball out of mid-air, the crowd cheered, chanting encouragement for her team, the monarchs. so far, the game had been a disaster. with 15 seconds left to go in the final quarter, the monarchs were 2 points shy of victory. what main idea do the details in the passage suggest? the point guard sheena was not a very good player. the monarchs had never lost a basketball game. the monarchs were worried about losing. the crowd was not supporting the monarchs.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
Read the passage from animal farm. "that was part of the arrangement! " cried squealer. "jones's shot only grazed him. i could show you this in his own writing, if you were able to read it. the plot was for snowball, at the critical moment, to give the signal for flight and leave the field to the enemy. and he very nearly succeeded—i will even say, comrades, he would have succeeded if it had not been for our heroic leader, comrade napoleon. do you not remember how, just at the moment when jones and his men had got inside the yard, snowball suddenly turned and fled, and many animals followed him? and do you not remember, too, that it was just at that moment, when panic was spreading and all seemed lost, that comrade napoleon sprang forward with a cry of 'death to humanity! ' and sank his teeth in jones's leg? surely you remember that, comrades? " exclaimed squealer, frisking from side to side. now when squealer described the scene so graphically, it seemed to the animals that they did remember it. at any rate, they remembered that at the critical moment of the battle snowball had turned to flee. but boxer was still a little uneasy. how does the characterization of squealer support the author’s purpose? squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and stalin’s propagandists. squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Read the following summary of the supreme court majority opinion in the tinker v. des moines case:...
Questions
question
Physics, 26.05.2020 02:04
question
English, 26.05.2020 02:57
Questions on the website: 13722367